Comment added by
Kris on Feb 11, 2009 00:58 PST(1 years ago):
Awesome stuff. Thanks for this.
Comment added by Dee on Feb 11, 2009 12:29 PST(1 years ago):
the future use of chrome for me solely depends on the addition of plug-ins and extensions or I'm just going back to firefox
Comment added by
FUS on Feb 13, 2009 09:32 PST(1 years ago):
Turns out it wasn't the fault of StopBadware.org, who do work with Google on the data - but it's actually Google's file. Wouldn't want to be the poor programmer who checked in that file ("don't worry mate, I think we fixed it before anyone noticed...") :-)
Comment added by
Ricky on Feb 13, 2009 19:16 PST(1 years ago):
Thnx buddy,It really works
Comment added by Josephine on Feb 16, 2009 07:28 PST(1 years ago):
You can't use stats on web sites named things like "GoogleChromeIsAwesome-O-SaysCartman.com.
People who have installed Chrome are much more likely to visit. Much better would be to see browser stats of how many people visit CNN, or Google itself, for that matter.
Comment added by
raj on Feb 17, 2009 04:38 PST(1 years ago):
i am a requyarment this google chrome.
Comment added by
michelle on Feb 17, 2009 11:26 PST(1 years ago):
i followed the instructions completely, but nothing changes at all.
Comment added by
Mike on Feb 18, 2009 10:55 PST(1 years ago):
Excellent page rank checker thanks...
Comment added by lodajsduq on Feb 22, 2009 19:05 PST(1 years ago):
http://www.efront.com.ua
Èíòåðíåò-ìàãàçèí Áûòîâîé è Êîìïüþòåðíîé òåõíèêè â Îäåññå
Recently Alexa added new features in their Top http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehotels.in Sites Lists. These features have come to be extremeley well recieved by the web professionals.
Comment added by elver garcia on Feb 28, 2009 11:20 PST(1 years ago):
muy chingon y sencillo de usar...increible
Yes. It supports export / import now... ;)
Comment added by anurg on Mar 03, 2009 16:30 PST(1 years ago):
Come on guys you could have given a few things.Atleast there should have been an option for do not load images and chrome doesn't even ask when multiple tabs are being closed this is very annoying. Unless you guys release some good addons soon your browser is going down.
Comment added by Wynsong Peters on Mar 03, 2009 18:50 PST(1 years ago):
I just completed this procedure to run google chrome, and chrome still crashes. Any other suggestions.
Comment added by an on Mar 07, 2009 00:03 PST(1 years ago):
nice but tabs are still blue,
wanna make them gray thx
Comment added by
Dr. Post on Mar 08, 2009 07:49 PDT(1 years ago):
Thanks for the great info! I haven't yet switched to Chrome but this is one more reason that I need to switch.
Comment added by david pearlman on Mar 10, 2009 09:07 PDT(1 years ago):
Too inconsistent, some days page rank is slow, if there was a way to have it always posted like firefox that would be off the heezy. Thank you!
Comment added by
Forums Anime on Mar 14, 2009 07:01 PDT(1 years ago):
lol i remember that, stopbadware.org was getting a botnet attack and their sitewas out. Yet it did not seem to run that long
Comment added by John Sim on Mar 15, 2009 21:45 PDT(1 years ago):
From what I understand it would be a Windows security API issue, as currently Chrome is being designed to use certain security related XP and above APIs (read DLL) which are not yet available in W2K.
Apparently there is no reason for Chrome not to be compatible with any operating as a MacOS and Linux versions would presumably already be in the making. Either of them will have the Windows XP and above security API available to them.
These operating systems from the ground up have been designed with security in mind, rather then just reaching a large audiences... (see the pattern here?)
If these "new" Windows security features are so vital to Chrome then the Chrome team will have to develop their own version of these new (presumably build in) security features to have them available on any of these non-Windows OS-es, which would also indicate the same could be done for W2K.
My guess is also that these "new" security features are not intended to keep people safe when browsing (as it's the underlying OS itself that is supposed to keep you safe) but rather are needed to restrict/control people that are downloading and playing available multimedia from Google owned/affiliated websites.
The main reason I still use W2K myself is that I still have early P4 systems that would become too slow running the newer versions of Windows.
I do not believe that people should be forced to upgrade the hardware of perfectly good running systems, just so they can support an OS-es graphical features..?
Last time I checked what an "Operating System" is supposed to be is a reasonably secure and stable platform that controls the system's hardware and at the same time is a launching pad for any application you choose to install and run on that it...
The latest Windows version fitting that description would still be W2K, I'm afraid...
Comment added by
Nom d'un chien on Mar 16, 2009 05:41 PDT(1 years ago):
Thanks for this tool, very useful for Chrome users.
Page: 7 / 46
All Pages:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46]